May 12, 2005

Tracing smartness in genes

Filed under: Uncategorized — @ 1:26 am

It is fashionable to attribute everything to genes, or sometimes more vaguely, biological factors. For example, your insatiated desire to surf the internet is determined by your genes—the same circuit as that of substance addition.When it comes to human intelligence, everybody can testify the genetic root of intelligence based on his/her own family history.

Yes, as large as 50% of human intelligence may be genetic determined. However, the fact that intelligence has a large genetic component within groups may have nothing to do with the racial or ethnical difference in human intelligence, as the group difference can be due to the other 50% of influence, the non-genetic, or culture factors.

Because of the scarcity of family studies among Blacks, it is uncertain whether the heritability in Blacks is the same as that in Whites. The twin studies, or sometime less favorable sibling studies, track the life history of either monozygotic or dizygotic twins, or siblings, reared together or apart. It can directly examine gene-environmental interaction in relation to human intelligence (hereafter I refer to IQ).Some suggested that the heritability in Blacks might be indeed smaller than that in Whites. The proportion of shared components between twins and siblings was different between Blacks and Whites. However, the shared components also include family influence. Mothers are more influential to the child’s development than other family members. Another interesting finding was that the nonshared proportion decreased to almost zero after age 30. Some declared that the racial difference of IQ in adults could be attributed to genetics. IF this racial difference in heritability is true, it may also imply that environmental factors such as education level within Blacks are more heterogeneous, while Whites have similar education attainment, thus the variation of intelligence is more likely due to genetic factors.

Transracial adoption study is the natural experiment of cross-fostering design in which people adopt children from different racial background. Biological children have no genetic relationship with adopted children. The environmental influences between them can also be assumed the same. The Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study included 265 children from White upper middle families. At age 7, the average IQ for nonadopted White children (biological children) was 117; adopted children with two White biological parents had average IQ of 112; and it was 109 for adopted with one White and one Black biological parent, while those adopted children with two Black biological parents had average IQ of only 97. The differences became larger when they were reexamined at age 17. In particular, those with two Black biological parents were essentially not different from general Black children. It seemed that given the same environment—upper middle White parents, those who had Black biological parents had significantly lower IQ than others, which pointed to the direction of genetic determinism.Furthermore, children adopted from Asian countries unequivocally had much higher IQ than both Whites and Blacks had. Then the differences among transracially adopted children were not due to earlier childhood experience.

However, to literally interpret the above data is overtly dangerous. Recent studies have shown that the adopted children do not necessary grow up the same way as their step-siblings. For example, the Black children may feel subtle pressure within White families. These subtleties may have effects on their learning and daily activities. In fact, the gradient from biologically related children to adopted children and to black children in the above study suggested that the different growth track did exist between biological and adopted children. There should be no difference between biological white children and adopted white children. Furthermore, even the biological siblings have different social circlesin the school. The friends with whom Black children interact are also different, as the de facto racial separation in schools is not uncommon. Data are gradually available to explore this issue.

No matter how convincing the evidence from twin, sibling, adoption and family studies are, one can not answer what kind of genes are responsible for human intelligence. If the genes affecting intelligence are somehow linked to the characteristics of race or geographically defined groups, another natural experiment may be more interesting. Racial admixture is pervasive in the US and South American. If we can compare the IQ from those racially mixed people with those non-mixed people, we may be able to solve the IQ mystery once for all. However, one can’t rely on characteristics such as skin color to determine the racial admixture because it is the skin color and other physical appearance that cause all sorts of discrimination and separation in our society. Therefore, studies based on skin color are of little value in verifying the genetic hypothesis, even though statistical adjustments are exhaustive. The DNA based racial definition, or more precisely, polymorphism clusters, may be a better indicator to examine the genetic hypothesis of IQ. Unfortunately, data of this sort are not available.

Then, what are the implications of all the above discussion? Are the racial difference in IQ is real? What causes the difference? Unfortunately, the difference is real but we don’t know why. Another equally distressing fact is that Blacks are suffering almost all disadvantages. For example, they are more likely to die young, more likely to engage risky behavior such as bad diet. They also tend to be uneducated and unemployed. Are they all genetically based? The stereotypic view that Blacks equals to violence is also taught in most families and from TV, either deliberately or unintentionally. What are the effects of that?

One should always remember the history. Even within European descendents, people from Ireland, Balkan, and old England, were considered uncivilized and unintelligent. Those medieval aristocrats held a common view that peasants were dumb and intelligently underdeveloped. Now all white skinned people are thought equally intelligent. It is unconceivable that within hundreds of years, all of their genes become the same.

The search for genetic basis of the racial difference in IQ is one of many facets of new racism. We may have to wait till all races are biologically mixed up, and then the need of race definition and all related debates will disappear.

1 Comment »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment


Freely hosted by www.xlogit.com. Powered by WordPress.